MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2990501417 · doi:10.3138/mous.16.3.004

Slinking Home to Mother: Pindar on Losers (Pyth. 8.81–87)

2019· article· en· W2990501417 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Christopher G. Brown

Bibliographic record

VenueMouseion Journal of the Classical Association of Canada · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVictoryPoetryCompetition (biology)Extant taxonLiteraturePresentation (obstetrics)OdeHistoryArtLawPolitical scienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Eighth Pythian is the last datable poem in the extant remains of Pindar’s poetry. It celebrates a victory won in 446 bc by Aristomenes of Aegina, who seems to have competed at Delphi in the boys’ wrestling competition. It has often been observed that Pindar seems remarkably reluctant to describe the details of the competition that occasioned an ode, and in this case the poem is noteworthy for containing one of only two passages in the corpus of epinicians that describe the defeated (81–87). The present article will consider this passage in detail. It will be argued that Pindar’s presentation of Aristomenes’ victory reflects the initiatory aspects of boys’ athletics in Greek society, suggesting that the victor flying aloft on wings of manly deeds has joined the company of adult men, whereas the defeated slinking home to their mothers remain in the world of childhood.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0080.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMouseion Journal of the Classical Association of CanadaSame topicClassical Antiquity StudiesFrench-language works237,207