MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2990563249 · doi:10.29173/axismundi67

Effing the Ineffable

2017· article· en· W2990563249 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueAxis Mundi · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedia, Religion, Digital Communication
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNewspaperIslamDanishLawMedia studiesHistoryPolitical scienceReligious studiesSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex


 
 
 On September 30th of 2005 the Jyllands-Posten, a Danish newspaper, published twelve cartoons of the Muslim prophet Muhammad. Islamic law forbids all depictions of Muhammad because they are idolatrous, and the fact that these cartoons were perceived as disrespectful intensified the offence. Many Danish Muslims felt that these illustrations were inappropriate, even discriminatory; people staged protests and demanded apologies, and Muslim organizations condemned the Jyllands-Posten. Regardless, the cartoons – and other, even more insulting ones – quickly spread. Newspapers in dozens of countries reprinted the offending cartoons, and the speed of internet communications meant that the illustrations were available for viewing by anyone. As more and more countries became involved, protests escalated to riots and people on both sides of the controversy were killed.
 
 

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.928
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it