MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The International Childbirth Initiative: 12 Steps to Safe and Respectful MotherBaby-Family Maternity Care

2019· article· en· W2990569791 on OpenAlex
André B. Lalonde, K. Herschderfer, Debra Pascali‐Bonaro, Claudia Hanson, Carlos Fuchtner, Gerard H.A. Visser

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetric Anesthesia Digest · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDyadMedicineChildbirthMaternity careGeneral partnershipNursingUnit (ring theory)Health careFamily medicinePregnancyPsychologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

( Int J Gynecol Obstet . 2019;146:65–73) An initiative to guide and support quality maternity care has been launched by the International MotherBaby Childbirth Organization (IMBCO) and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). “The International Childbirth Initiative (ICI): 12 Steps to Safe and Respectful MotherBaby-Family Maternity Care” is a guide to implementing evidence-based maternity care with consideration of the MotherBaby dyad and family environment. The traditional medicine model has been shifted by the development of value-based care models focusing on the partnership between the provider and the care recipient. The ICI places the “MotherBaby-Family” unit as the central recipient of care, as the health of 1 member of the MotherBaby dyad has important impacts on the other. This model incorporates the practice of midwifery as a foundation of safe and respectful care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.357
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it