Forholdet mellem det verbale sprog og kropssproget i udvalgte grønlandske teaterproduktioner i 2017*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Med udgangspunkt i Nicole Tersis et aliis Words and Gesture. An Inuit storyteller in East Greenland (2016) og Marcel Mauss’ Techniques of the Body (opr.1936/1973), vil min artikel fokusere på kroppen som kulturelt symbol i forbindelse med udvalgte grønlandske teaterproduktioner, som jeg har observeret i løbet af 2017. Formålet er i denne kontekst at fremanalysere forholdet mellem det verbale og det kropslige sprog og at vurdere, hvordan der er tale om et ’særligt grønlandsk’ udtryk i performansen.As a starting point with Nicole Tersis et aliis Words and Gesture. An Inuit storyteller in East Greenland (2016) and Marcel Mauss’ Techniques of the Body (1936/1971), my article will focus on the body as a cultural symbol in Greenlandic theatre productions which I have observed in 2017. The purpose of the context is to analyze the relationship between the verbal and body language and to evaluate how there is a ’particularly’ Greenlandic expression in the performances.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".