MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2990627150 · doi:10.5539/jpl.v12n4p87

Digital Transformation of Law and Socio-Political Relations in the Eurasian Space – on the Example of the Russian Federation

2019· article· en· W2990627150 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
P. Baranov, Алексей Мамычев, Alexander Kim, Tatyana Cherkasova, Pavel Kolimbet

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Politics and Law · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDigital Transformation in Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRussian Foundation for Basic Research
KeywordsCyberspaceDigital transformationNormativePoliticsPolitical scienceProcess (computing)Space (punctuation)Law enforcementState (computer science)Russian federationLaw and economicsLawPrinciple of legalityValue (mathematics)SociologyComputer securityComputer scienceThe Internet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper discusses the processes of digital transformation of the political and legal systems of society in the Eurasian space (for example, the Russian state-legal organization). The authors discuss the process of introducing digital technology and artificial intelligence into the enforcement process, as well as the impact of digital technology on the political process. The content explains that a virtual digital space is currently being formed and most public relations are starting to unfold in it. At the same time, it is shown that in cyberspace, traditional value- normative regulators do not have the necessary effectiveness in regulating the interaction of people, and between people and virtual digital actors. The necessity of creating new regulatory systems and safety standards is substantiated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Politics and LawSame topicDigital Transformation in LawFrench-language works237,207