Application of Different Concentration-Response Functions to Estimate the Societal Benefits of Reducing PM2.5 and NOx Emissions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: We assess the societal benefits of reducing air pollutant emissions that contribute to ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5), ozone (O3), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) exposure and public health impacts. Recent evidence suggests that nonlinear, multi-pollutant concentration-response (C-R) models are more appropriate than traditional, linear forms used in epidemiology. We examine the implications of alternate C-R models in an emissions reduction framework.Methods: We integrate C-R models for non-accidental mortality due to PM2.5, O3, and NO2 into the Community Multiscale Air Quality Model (CMAQ). This sophisticated atmospheric model and its adjoint tool allow us to trace public health impacts back to sources of pollutant emissions. We compare the monetized public health benefits of reducing emissions from sources across Central Canada at a 12 km resolution for July 2010. We apply C-R models (single or multipollutant and linear or nonlinear) derived from the 2001 Canadian Census Health and Environment Cohort (CanCHEC).Results: Our preliminary results indicate significant and widespread benefits of PM2.5 and NOx (NO + NO2) emissions control, particularly in major urban areas of Central Canada. We find benefits ranging from $400,000-800,000 per ton of reduction in PM2.5 from sources in Toronto, while NOx control for the same location entails benefits of $2,000-200,000/ton depending on the choice of C-R model. Nonlinear models consistently produce larger benefit estimates than their linear counterparts. We estimate coefficients of variation based solely on the choice of C-R model to be 0.4-0.6 for PM2.5 and 0.6-1.6 for NOx.Conclusions: Our results show that the public health benefits of emission reductions are highly sensitive to C-R specification, and that traditional C-R models may significantly underestimate the benefits of air pollution controls. Further research is needed to determine the most appropriate C-R model to support public policy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".