Robust elastic net estimators for variable selection and identification of proteomic biomarkers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In large-scale quantitative proteomic studies, scientists measure the abundance of thousands of proteins from the human proteome in search of novel biomarkers for a given disease. Penalized regression estimators can be used to identify potential biomarkers among a large set of molecular features measured. Yet, the performance and statistical properties of these estimators depend on the loss and penalty functions used to define them. Motivated by a real plasma proteomic biomarkers study, we propose a new class of penalized robust estimators based on the elastic net penalty, which can be tuned to keep groups of correlated variables together in the selected model and maintain robustness against possible outliers. We also propose an efficient algorithm to compute our robust penalized estimators and derive a data-driven method to select the penalty term. Our robust penalized estimators have very good robustness properties and are also consistent under certain regularity conditions. Numerical results show that our robust estimators compare favorably to other robust penalized estimators. Using our proposed methodology for the analysis of the proteomics data, we identify new potentially relevant biomarkers of cardiac allograft vasculopathy that are not found with nonrobust alternatives. The selected model is validated in a new set of 52 test samples and achieves an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) of 0.85.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.028 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".