MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2990687096 · doi:10.1109/ias.2019.8912465

dq0 PHT-Based Digital Differential Protection for 3φ Converter Transformers

2019· article· en· W2990687096 on OpenAlexaff
S. A. Saleh, X. F. St. Onge, Chistian Richard, E. Ozkop

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems Fault Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformerDifferential protectionComputer scienceElectronic engineeringFault detection and isolationSensitivity (control systems)Current transformerComputationEngineeringElectrical engineeringVoltageAlgorithmActuator

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a new digital differential protection for three phase (3φ) converter transformers. The proposed digital differential protection is developed to comply with the Standard ANSI 87 T, and is designed to detect and identify internal faults based on the energy contents of the high frequency subbands present in the d - q-axis components of the differential currents. Desired energy contents are quantified using the phaselet transform (PHT), which can process signals without sensitivity to the variations in their phase shifts. Energy contents of the high frequency sub-bands offer accurate, fast, and reliable detection and identification of internal faults in any part of a 3φ converter transformer. The d - q PHT-based digital differential protection is implemented for performance evaluation using different 3φ converter transformers, when feeding controlled rectifier units. Performance results demonstrate accurate, fast and reliable detection and response to different types of fault and non-fault events. Response features of the developed differential protection are complimented with simple implementation, reduced computations, and minor sensitivity to phase shifts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.784
Threshold uncertainty score0.461

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Systems Fault DetectionFrench-language works237,207