A Novel Electric Vehicles Charging/Discharging Management Protocol Based on Queuing Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High electric vehicles (EVs) penetration is expected to increase smart grid solicitation especially with various EV charging demands. As result, the EV charging process at the supply station has to be managed in the way to promote the EV satisfaction level while preserving smart grid stability. In this article, the bidirectional power flow between EV and grid; Grid-to-Vehicle (G2V) and Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G), is exploited. We make a profit from the unused electric power of EVs and we present an EV load management technique based on EV charging and EV discharging coordination. We propose a peak load management model (PLM) used to schedule EVs for charging or discharging service according to the power demand with the timing and location where each EV need to be served. Also, we propose an Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE) selection model to guide EVs to the supply station. We develop a mathematical formalism for handling requests for EV charging/discharging at EVSE based on queuing theory. Those models are evaluated while considering the mobility of vehicles in an urban scenario and time-of-use-pricing (TOUP). Finally, extensive matlab simulations are conducted to validate the proposed approach and demonstrate its effectiveness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".