CIPP Model Evaluation of the 2013 Curriculum Implementation Training Program in Jakarta – Indonesia (Case Study: Islamic Educational Supervisor)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Implementation of the 2013 curriculum training program for Islamic Educational Supervisors and to measure their capacity in terms of 2013 curriculum competency using the CIPP model of evaluation. The importance of improving the competency of Educational Supervisor through Implementation training program of 2013 curricula, because they hold a very significant and strategic role in improving the quality teaching of Islamic Educational teachers (Guru PAI), acted as educational supervisor, counselor, and motivator. This article would like to answer several questions; how the Implementation of Curriculum 2013 training was able to boost the Islamic Educational Supervisor Competency in terms of their academic ability. The paper aims to discuss the issue of Islamic Supervisor in terms of curriculum 2013 competency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it