MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2990699541 · doi:10.22215/etd/2016-11297

Corporate Greening of Canadian Manufacturers: A Partial Least Square Analysis

2016· dissertation· en· W2990699541 on OpenAlexaffabout
Faisal Faza

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSustainable Supply Chain Management
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreeningSupply chainStructural equation modelingBusinessIndustrial organizationStakeholderSupply chain managementProduct (mathematics)Competitive advantageStakeholder theoryProduction (economics)MarketingEnvironmental economicsEconomicsMicroeconomicsManagementComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many manufacturing companies are increasingly investing in green supply chain management.However, surprisingly little attention has been dedicated to the consideration of whether and how stakeholder pressure affects greening of the supply chain with consequent financial performance and competitive advantage outcomes.Thus, this study establishes a research model to investigate the interaction of these constructs and to reveal the role of green production and green supply chain management in the relationships.Data were collected through a cross-industry survey from 94 manufacturing companies in Canada.The data were analyzed using the Partial Least Square based Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) approach to test the hypothesized model.The findings provide managers with a new insight on the effects of stakeholder pressures on the adoption of green product design/processes, the greening of the supply chain, and the managerial commitment required for manufacturers to gain increased wealth and sustainable competitiveness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.179

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSustainable Supply Chain ManagementFrench-language works237,207