MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2990756884

Simplified estimation of binding parameters based on image-derived reference tissue models for dopamine transporter bindings in non-human primates using [<sup>18</sup>F]FE-PE2I and PET.

2017· article· en· W2990756884 on OpenAlexaff
Ikuo Odano, Andrea Varrone, Tetsuo Hosoya, Kazuya Sakaguchi, Balázs Gulyás, Parasuraman Padmanabhan, Krishna Ghosh, Chang‐Tong Yang, Ilonka Guenther, Zhimin Wang, Raymond Serrano, Nevil Ghislain Chimon, Christer Halldin

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Aging
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoxelDopamine transporterParametric statisticsImage qualityComputer scienceNoise (video)Artificial intelligenceImage (mathematics)Nuclear medicineComputer visionMedicineMathematicsStatisticsDopamine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

F]FE-PE2I and dynamic PET as well as an MRI was performed on three rhesus monkeys, and metabolite corrected arterial plasma inputs were obtained. After co-registering of PET to MR images, both image sets were resliced. The time-activity curve of the cerebellum was used as indirect input, and binding parametric images were computed voxel-by-voxel. Voxel-wise linear calculations were used for the Logan DVR approach, and nonlinear least squares fittings for the SRTM. To determine the best linear regression in the Logan DVR approach, the distribution volume ratio was obtained using the optimal starting frame analysis. The obtained binding parameters were compared with those obtained by the other independent ROI-based numerical approaches: two-tissue compartment model (2TCM), Logan DVR approach and SRTM using PMOD software. Binding potentials (BP) obtained by the present approach agreed well with those obtained by ROI-based numerical approaches, although reference tissue models tended to underestimate the BP value than 2TCM. Image-derived Logan approach provided a low-noise image, the computation time was short, and the error in the optimal starting frame analysis was small. The present approach provides a high-quality binding parametric image and reliable parameter value easily.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207