MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2990785425 · doi:10.22215/cjcr.v4i1.1166

An Interview with Landon Pearson: On the Role of a Commissioner for Canada’s Children

2017· article· en· W2990785425 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Daniella Bendo

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Children s Rights / Revue canadienne des droits des enfants · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicResearch in Social Sciences
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)Pearson product-moment correlation coefficientFunction (biology)LawPsychologyPolitical scienceSociologyComputer scienceMathematicsArtificial intelligenceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this interview with Daniella Bendo, PhD Candidate at Carleton University in the Department of Law and Legal Studies, Landon Pearson builds on her reflections and shares her experiences, insights, and perspective on the need for a Commissioner for children and youth in Canada. Mrs. Pearson sheds light on the potential role and function of a Commissioner and provides important recommendations to advance the field of child and youth advocacy in this country and abroad.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.591

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0430.017
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0050.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Children s Rights / Revue canadienne des droits des enfantsSame topicResearch in Social SciencesFrench-language works237,207