MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2990797043 · doi:10.1109/edocw.2019.00015

Digital Transformation – Implications for Enterprise Modeling and Analysis

2019· article· en· W2990797043 on OpenAlexaff
Zia Babar, Eric Yu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDigital Transformation in Industry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital transformationEnterprise modellingEnterprise integrationComputer scienceEnterprise softwareKnowledge managementEnterprise information systemIntegrated enterprise modelingProcess managementEnterprise systems engineeringEnterprise architectureEnterprise life cycleAdaptation (eye)Flexibility (engineering)StakeholderBusiness processBusiness transformationBusiness process modelingBusinessWorld Wide WebManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Digital transformation is a recent phenomenon that is causing enterprises to adopt new business models and transform their core business operations. For this, enterprise architects require an enterprise modeling framework that would provide a systematic and structured mechanism for managing change in the enterprise at multiple levels and perspectives. This paper describes a set of digital transformation characteristics identified through a systematic literature review to identify research articles that attempt to define, discuss or share experiences regarding digital transformation in enterprises. These characteristics were then abstracted out as a set of requirements for a future enterprise modeling framework that enterprise architects can use to model and analyze enterprises that are undergoing transformation due to emerging digital technologies. Such a modeling framework would allow enterprise architects to analyze enterprises undergoing digital transformation, while considering complexities of software systems and business process design, data-driven decision making, flexibility and adaptation in enterprises, and stakeholder motives and intentions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDigital Transformation in IndustryFrench-language works237,207