Multiple constrained minimum variance beamformer (MCMV) performance in connectivity analyses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Functional brain connectivity is increasingly being seen as critical for cognition, perception and motor control. Magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography are modalities that offer noninvasive mapping of electrophysiological interactions among brain regions, yet suffer from signal leakage and signal cancellation when estimating brain activity. This leads to biased connectivity values which complicate interpretation. In this study, we test the hypothesis that a Multiple Constrained Minimum Variance beamformer (MCMV) outperforms the more traditional Linearly Constrained Minimum Variance beamformer (LCMV) for estimation of electrophysiological connectivity. To this end, MCMV and LCMV performance is compared in task related analyses with both simulated data and human MEG recordings of visual steady state signals, and in resting state analyses with simulated data and human MEG data of 89 subjects. In task related scenarios connectivity was estimated using coherence and phase locking values, whereas envelope correlations were used for the resting state data. We also introduce a novel Augmented Pairwise MCMV (APW-MCMV) approach for signal leakage suppression in resting state analyses and assess its performance against LCMV and more conventional MCMV approaches. We demonstrate that with MCMV effects of signal mixing and coherent source cancellation are greatly reduced in both task related and resting state conditions, while in contrast to other approaches 0- and short time lag interactions are preserved. In addition, we demonstrate that in resting state analyses, APW-MCMV strongly reduces spurious connections while better controlling for false negatives compared to more conservative measures such as symmetrical orthogonalization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".