Tissue traction microscopy to quantify muscle contraction within precision-cut lung slices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In asthma, acute bronchospasm is driven by contractile forces of airway smooth muscle (ASM). These forces can be imaged in the cultured ASM cell or assessed in the muscle strip and the tracheal/bronchial ring, but in each case, the ASM is studied in isolation from the native airway milieu. Here, we introduce a novel platform called tissue traction microscopy (TTM) to measure ASM contractile force within porcine and human precision-cut lung slices (PCLS). Compared with the conventional measurements of lumen area changes in PCLS, TTM measurements of ASM force changes are 1) more sensitive to bronchoconstrictor stimuli, 2) less variable across airways, and 3) provide spatial information. Notably, within every human airway, TTM measurements revealed local regions of high ASM contraction that we call “stress hotspots”. As an acute response to cyclic stretch, these hotspots promptly decreased but eventually recovered in magnitude, spatial location, and orientation, consistent with local ASM fluidization and resolidification. By enabling direct and precise measurements of ASM force, TTM should accelerate preclinical studies of airway reactivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".