MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2990913701 · doi:10.1115/1.4045491

NBLSTM: Noisy and Hybrid Convolutional Neural Network and BLSTM-Based Deep Architecture for Remaining Useful Life Estimation

2019· article· en· W2990913701 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkComputer scienceRobustness (evolution)Deep learningArtificial intelligenceSoftware deploymentProcess (computing)Artificial neural networkMachine learningPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Smart manufacturing and industrial Internet of things (IoT) have transformed the maintenance management concept from the conventional perspective of being reactive to being predictive. Recent advancements in this regard has resulted in development of effective prognostic health management (PHM) frameworks, which coupled with deep learning architectures have produced sophisticated techniques for remaining useful life (RUL) estimation. Accurately predicting the RUL significantly empowers the decision-making process and allows deployment of advanced maintenance strategies to improve the overall outcome in a timely fashion. In light of this, the paper proposes a novel noisy deep learning architecture consisting of multiple models designed in parallel, referred to as noisy and hybrid deep architecture for remaining useful life estimation (NBLSTM). The proposed NBLSTM is designed by integration of two parallel noisy deep architectures, i.e., a noisy convolutional neural network (CNN) to extract spatial features and a noisy bidirectional long short-term memory (BLSTM) to extract temporal information learning the dependencies of input data in both forward and backward directions. The two paths are connected through a fusion center consisting of fully connected multilayers, which combines their outputs and forms the target predicted RUL. To improve the robustness of the model, the NBLSTM is trained based on noisy input signals leading to significantly robust and enhanced generalization behavior. Through 100 Monte Carlo simulation runs performed under three different signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) values, it can be noted that utilization of the noisy training enhanced the results by reducing the standard deviation (std) between 9% and 67% across different settings in terms of the root-mean-square error (RMSE) and between 21% and 63% in terms of the score value. The proposed NBLSTM model is evaluated and tested based on the commercial modular aero-propulsion system simulation (C-MAPSS) dataset provided by NASA, illustrating state-of-the-art results in comparison with its counterparts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.313
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it