MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2990924310 · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2019.111542

L-Band response to freeze/thaw in a boreal forest stand from ground- and tower-based radiometer observations

2019· article· en· W2990924310 on OpenAlexafffund
Alexandre Roy, Peter Toose, Alex Mavrovic, Christoforos Pappas, Alain Royer, Chris Derksen, Aaron Berg, Tracy Rowlandson, Mariam El-Amine, Alan Barr, T. Andrew Black, Alexandre Langlois, Oliver Sonnentag

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing of Environment · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of GuelphEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresUniversité de SherbrookeCenter for Northern StudiesUniversité de Montréal
FundersCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsRemote sensingTaigaRadiometerEnvironmental scienceTowerBorealMeteorologyGeologyGeographyForestry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The extent, timing and duration of seasonal freeze/thaw (FT) state exerts dominant control on boreal forest carbon, water and energy cycle processes. Recent and on-going L-Band (≈1.4 GHz) spaceborne missions have the potential to provide enhanced information on FT state over large geographic regions with rapid revisit time. However, the low spatial resolution of these spaceborne observations (≈45 km) makes it difficult to isolate the primary contributions (soil, vegetation, snow) to the FT signal in boreal forest . To better quantify these controls, two L-Band radiometers were deployed (September 2016 to July 2017) at a black spruce ( Picea mariana ) dominated boreal forest site; one unit above and one unit on the ground surface below the canopy to disentangle the microwave contributions of overstory canopy, and the ground surface on the FT brightness temperature ( T B ) signal. Bi-weekly multi-angular measurements from both units were combined in order to estimate effective scattering albedo ( ω ) and the microwave vegetative optical depth ( τ ), using the τ - ω microwave vegetation radiative transfer model. Soil moisture probes were inserted in the trunk of two black spruce and one larch ( Larix laricina ) trunks located in the footprint of the above-canopy radiometer to measure tree trunk relative dielectric constant (RDC tree ). Results showed a strong relationship between RDC tree and tree skin temperature (T tree ) under freezing temperature conditions, which led to a gradual decrease of τ in winter. During the spring thawing period in April and May, τ remained relatively stable. In contrast, it increased substantially in June, most likely in relation to the growing season onset. Overall, τ was related to the seasonal RDC tree cycle ( r = 0.76). Regarding ω , a value of 0.086 (±0.029) was obtained, but no dependency on T tree or RDC tree was observed. Despite the observed impact of FT on vegetation L-Band signals, results from continuous T B observations spanning from 14 September 2016 to 25 May 2017, indicated that the main contribution to the observed L-Band T B freeze-up signal in the fall originated from the ground surface. The above-canopy unit showed some sensitivity to overstory canopy FT, yet the sensitivity was lower compared to the signal induced by the ground FT. In April and May, L-Band radiometer FT retrieval agreed closely to the melt onset detection using RDC tree but it was likely related to the coincident presence of liquid water in the snow. Our findings have important applications to L-Band spaceborne FT algorithm development and validation across the boreal forest. More specifically, our findings allow better quantification of the potential effect of frozen ground on various biogeophysical and biogeochemical processes in boreal forests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.642
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRemote Sensing of EnvironmentSame topicSoil Moisture and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207