MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2990973753 · doi:10.4000/volume.7211

Musique et hacking : de l’éthique aux pratiques

2019· article· fr· W2990973753 on OpenAlexaff
Baptiste Bacot, Clément Canonne

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume ! · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCybernetics and Technology in Society
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHackerHumanitiesArtComputer scienceComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Par ses ramifications multiples, le hacking a donné naissance à d’innombrables pratiques. La figure du hacker, qui émerge à partir des années 1960 dans les laboratoires de computer science des universités américaines, signale le début d’un mouvement qui allait rapidement se propager de manière virale et protéiforme. Si le hacking est bien lié au développement de l’informatique et du réseau Internet, depuis les tentatives pionnières au sein du Tech Model Railroad Club (TMRC) du Massachussets I...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.077
Scholarly communication0.0130.015
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0070.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume !Same topicCybernetics and Technology in SocietyFrench-language works237,207