MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2990977505 · doi:10.4000/rief.3314

Avant Corinne : L’Italienne de Jean-François Dognon

2019· article· fr· W2990977505 on OpenAlexaff
Shelly Charles

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue italienne d’études françaises · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier UniversityHistorical Studies in Education
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peut-on lire Corinne ou l’Italie comme une amplification de L’Italienne, ou Amour et Persévérance ? Paru en 1804, le roman de Jean-François Dognon mêlait déjà un tour d’Italie inspiré de Dupaty à une histoire d’amour où les caractères nationaux jouaient un rôle essentiel. L’article met à l’épreuve l’hypothèse d’un palimpseste en analysant un réseau ramifié de correspondances : l’alternance entre discours narratif et discours savant, la caractérisation individuelle et culturelle des personnages, la présence de péripéties communes. Il met aussi en évidence l’intertexte fictionnel partagé de Corinne et de L’Italienne : Grandison, le roman anglo-italien de Samuel Richardson et l’épisode italien de La Nouvelle Héloïse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue italienne d’études françaisesSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207