MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2991053790 · doi:10.1289/isee.2016.3721

Quantifying the adoption, usage patterns, and air pollution concentrations from a novel household energy package in the Tibetan Plateau

2016· article· en· W2991053790 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnergy and Environment Impacts
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlateau (mathematics)Air pollutionPollutionEnvironmental scienceR packageEnvironmental healthEnvironmental protectionBiologyMedicineStatisticsEcologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cooking with traditional biomass stoves impacts climate and human health. High adoption and use of low-polluting stoves and fuels have the potential to reduce household air pollution and improve population health. Quantification of stove-fuel adoption, usage patterns, and resulting household air pollution concentrations is needed to assess intervention scalability and performance before larger-scale implementation. In Sept 2015, we placed temperature sensors on each stove and a wall (control) in 10 homes before and after receiving an energy package (semi-gasifer cookstove, water heater, & supply of processed biomass fuel) from a government energy demonstration project in the Tibetan Plateau, and conducted 5 months of continuous monitoring. In March 2016 we began monitoring 21 more homes when they received the same energy package. In addition, 48h stove-use and air pollution concentrations are being collecting in all study homes in 2016 (n=200). Cooking events are identified with a smoothing peak detection algorithm. Population-level metrics of stove-use include the total and proportion of days in use and the mean number of meals cooked per day with each stove. The new stove was used on 64% [95% CI 61-67] of stove-days (s-d) monitored (%=561/881 s-d) with an average of 1.7 [95% CI 1.6-1.7] meals cooked per day. Homes consistently used the stoves over 5 months (63% and 62% of s-d in months 1 and 5, respectively), while use of the traditional stove decreased from baseline (90% of s-d) to post-intervention (45% and 23% in months 1 and 4, respectively) (p<0.01). Concurrent use of the traditional and new stove occurred on 21% of the stove-days monitored. Early results indicate that the novel energy package was highly adopted and used consistently over 5 months, coinciding with a significant reduction in use of the traditional stove. Real-time stove use and air pollution data will be presented along with results from the full study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.762
Threshold uncertainty score0.510

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it