<i>Women at War in the Borderlands of the Early American Northeast</i>. By Gina Martino (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2018. Pp. 232. $27.95 hardcover.) <i>Women in the American Revolution: Gender, Politics, and the Domestic World</i>. Edited by Barbara B. Oberg. (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2019. Pp. 280. $39.50 cloth.)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
November 01 2019 Women at War in the Borderlands of the Early American Northeast; Women in the American Revolution: Gender, Politics, and the Domestic World Women at War in the Borderlands of the Early American Northeast. By GinaMartino (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2018. Pp. 232. $27.95 hardcover.)Women in the American Revolution: Gender, Politics, and the Domestic World. Edited by Barbara B.Oberg. (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2019. Pp. 280. $39.50 cloth.) Ann M. Little Ann M. Little Ann M. Little is professor of history at Colorado State University and specializes in the history of women, gender, and sexuality. She is the author of The Many Captivities of Esther Wheelwright which won the 2018 Albert B. Corey Prize/Prix from the American Historical and Canadian Historical Associations. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Author and Article Information Ann M. Little Ann M. Little is professor of history at Colorado State University and specializes in the history of women, gender, and sexuality. She is the author of The Many Captivities of Esther Wheelwright which won the 2018 Albert B. Corey Prize/Prix from the American Historical and Canadian Historical Associations. Online Issn: 1937-2213 Print Issn: 0028-4866 © 2019 by The New England Quarterly2019The New England Quarterly The New England Quarterly (2019) 92 (4): 651–658. https://doi.org/10.1162/tneq_r_00774 Cite Icon Cite Permissions Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Search Site Citation Ann M. Little; Women at War in the Borderlands of the Early American Northeast; Women in the American Revolution: Gender, Politics, and the Domestic World. The New England Quarterly 2019; 92 (4): 651–658. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/tneq_r_00774 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsThe New England Quarterly Search Advanced Search This content is only available as a PDF. © 2019 by The New England Quarterly2019The New England Quarterly Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.062 | 0.022 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".