MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2991088903 · doi:10.1096/fj.201901461r

Alteration of the brain methylation landscape following postnatal inflammatory injury in rat pups

2019· article· en· W2991088903 on OpenAlexafffund
Wyston C. Pierre, Lisa‐Marie Legault, Irene Londoño, Serge McGraw, Gregory A. Lodygensky

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCentre de recherche du CHU Sainte-JustineHealth Research
KeywordsMethylationMedicineDNA methylationPhysiologyNeuroscienceInternal medicineBiologyGeneticsGeneGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Preterm infants are vulnerable to inflammation-induced white matter injury (WMI), which is associated with neurocognitive impairment and increased risk of neuropsychiatric diseases in adulthood. Epigenetic mechanisms, particularly DNA methylation, play a role in normal development and modulate the response to pathological challenges. Our aims were to determine how WMI triggered DNA methylation alterations in brains of neonatal rats and if such changes persisted over time. We used a robust model of WMI by injecting lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or sterile saline in the corpus callosum of 3-day-old (P3) rat pups. Brains were collected 24 hours (P4) and 21 days post-injection (P24). We extracted genomic DNA from the brain to establish genome-wide quantitative DNA methylation profiles using reduced representation bisulfite sequencing. Neonatal LPS exposure induced a persistent increased methylation of genes related to nervous system development and a reduced methylation of genes associated with inflammatory pathways. These findings suggest that early-life neuroinflammatory exposure impacts the cerebral methylation landscape with determining widespread epigenetic modifications especially in genes related to neurodevelopment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.185

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicEpigenetics and DNA MethylationFrench-language works237,207