MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2991136525 · doi:10.14288/1.0385835

Recommendations for a National Dataverse Service

2019· report· en· W2991136525 on OpenAlexaffabout
Eugene Barsky, Corey Davis, Alan Darnell, Jason Flynn, Lisa Goddard, Meghan Goodchild, Amber Leahey, Erin MacPherson, Pierre R. Roberge, Brianne Selman, Wilson Lee

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2019
Typereport
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScientific Computing and Data Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WinnipegDalhousie UniversityCouncil of Prairie and Pacific University LibrariesUniversity of VictoriaQueen's UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Portage Network’s Dataverse North Working Group is developing a community of practice for Dataverse in Canada. As part of its work, the group has been looking at opportunities that could be addressed by nationally coordinated strategies, including hosting services provided by regional Dataverse providers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.352
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicScientific Computing and Data ManagementFrench-language works237,207