A congenital ulcerated nodule with spontaneous resolution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A female infant born by vaginal delivery at 38 weeks gestation had an ulcerated nodule on her left fifth finger that was noted at birth. Maternal health was unremarkable during the pregnancy and there was no maternal exposure to teratogenic agents. Parents were nonconsanguineous. There was no family history of similar lesions. Physical examination at 2 months of age was unremarkable except for a firm, ulcerated nodule with peripheral crusting on the ventral aspect of her left fifth finger (Figure 1). Laboratory investigations including complete blood cell count, C-reactive protein, serum electrolytes, serum creatinine, liver function tests, alkaline phosphatase, coagulation studies, urine specific gravity, radiography of the chest, skeletal radiograph survey, and abdominal ultrasound were normal. A biopsy of the nodule was also performed. The infant received follow up on a monthly basis with no intervention. At 4 months of age, the ulcerated nodule had resolved with scarring seen at the site of the previous lesion (Figure 2). On follow-up at 18 months of age, the child was completely well with no skin lesions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".