The influence of edge undulation on vortex formation for low-aspect-ratio propulsors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Experiments to study the effect of edge undulation on vortex formation have been conducted on impulsively accelerated plates. Abstractions of propulsors found in nature are produced by imprinting undulatory features with varying wavelengths onto the circumferential vortex-forming edge of circular plates. The effects of the small-scale disturbances introduced by these modifications are accessed by means of force measurements and time-resolved particle image velocimetry. Investigations of four different geometries at two different Reynolds numbers reveal an insensitivity of the flow towards length scales smaller than or similar to the thickness of the feeding shear layer. However, the instabilities in the shear layer and the coherence of the vortex wake are influenced when the wavelength of the undulation exceeds the shear-layer thickness by a significant margin. This results in a force augmentation due to enhanced entrainment into the turbulent vortex core, and thus an associated faster vortex growth rate. Yet, contrary to prior expectations, the time of vortex pinch-off remains constant for all edge modifications. The cause-effect relationship behind the stability of the vortex wake is further investigated. While for small edge undulations a turbulent transition of the vortex core results in vortex pinch-off, for larger edge undulations the turbulent vortex core is found to be fed constantly with additional circulation from the shear layer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".