MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2991189854 · doi:10.1093/fs/knz271

<i>L’Expression de la culpabilité chez Jules Supervielle</i> . Par <scp>Anne Lainard-Nutini</scp> <i>L’Expression de la culpabilité chez Jules Supervielle</i> . Par Lainard-NutiniAnne. (Critiques littéraires.) Paris: L’Harmattan, 2018. 332 pp.

2019· article· fr· W2991189854 on OpenAlexaff
Kenneth W. Meadwell

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench Studies · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Winnipeg
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInnocenceTheme (computing)RemorseAuntPsychoanalysisExpression (computer science)PoetryFace (sociological concept)Transcendence (philosophy)LiteraturePsychologyArtPhilosophyArt historyTheologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Critical studies of Jules Supervielle’s writings have underlined his naïve vision of the world and his predilection for ideas and images surrounding nature, innocence, nostalgia, and childhood, as well as the presence of the fantastical. This work focuses on the hitherto unexplored theme of guilt, of its overarching presence as a consequence of tensions between remorse, a quest for purity and transcendence, and recognition of mortality. The trauma of losing his parents, who died from drinking contaminated water, it is believed, while on a family trip from Uruguay to France when he was eight months old, and his discovery at around the age of nine that those whom he thought to be his parents were in fact his uncle and aunt, had a profound and lasting effect on the child and future writer. According to Anne Lainard-Nutini, ‘[c]e traumatisme, susceptible d’engendrer un déséquilibre psychique fatal, est à l’origine du besoin d’écrire’ (p. 21). Consequently, Supervielle’s works display a discourse of compensatory optimism whose aim is to achieve reparation in the face of guilt. Works studied include Supervielle’s poetry, novels, tales, plays, autobiographical writings, and correspondence. Stylistic analyses and the symbolic dimension of his works reveal the driving forces of the avowal of his perceived guilt, and its assuagement, rooted in his status as orphan belonging to two cultures, that of Uruguay and France. History plays an important role in the development of a dialogue between guilt and innocence, in that Supervielle’s attempts at redemption are expressed through the compassion that he expresses, for example, for the plight of the Boers at the hands of the British in the Boer War, in his poetry collection, Les Brumes du passé, and his revulsion at Franco’s bloody repression of republicans in the Spanish Civil War. In this way, a universal repentance expressed across the backdrop of the Western collective conscience serves to elucidate and condemn evil in an attempt at universal solidarity. Supervielle’s early poetry reveals a young man yearning to be whole, to be forging his own way in the literary world, liberated from the shadow of those whom he admired and who preceded him, such as Villon, Hugo, and Baudelaire. This avowal of his weakness underlines his desire to affirm his own capacities and talents, and leads to ‘la conquête libératrice de soi’ (p. 154). Supervielle’s quest for the assuagement of his guilt produces liberating images and ideas which are born, however, by deforming a normally realistic representation of the world in order to achieve redemption. An example of this is the description of the butchered animal in ‘La Vache de la forêt’, in which ‘l’imaginaire transgresse les frontières du vécu en convertissant l’abattage cruel en un cérémonial sacré’ (p. 238), according to Lainard-Nutini. The bloody act is elevated into a sacred ceremony. Supervielle’s works are steeped in self-doubt followed by self-affirmation, and in a sometimes fantastical creativity; above all, they offer a glimpse into his ‘mythologie personnelle’ (p. 318). This study eloquently elucidates, with evidence of significant research, the myriad forms of guilt expressed in his work, and makes an original and useful contribution to Supervielle studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.116

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrench StudiesSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207