MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2991263669 · doi:10.1182/blood-2019-128344

Addition of ATIR101, an Adjunctive Treatment Following T-Cell-Depleted Haploidentical HSCT, May Decrease Non-Relapse Mortality and May Improve Survival of Patients with Hematologic Malignancies, Irrespective of Prognostic Risk Factors

2019· article· en· W2991263669 on OpenAlexaffabout
Denis‐Claude Roy, Irwin Walker, Johan Maertens, Philippe Lewalle, Eduardo Olavarría, Yves Béguin, Dominik Selleslag, Eva Wagner, Halvard Bönig, Gerard M.J. Bos, Stephan Mielke

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityJuravinski HospitalUniversité de MontréalCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-MontréalHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineHematopoietic stem cell transplantationTransplantationOncologyGastroenterologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction ATIR101 is a donor-derived, T-cell-enriched leukocyte preparation depleted ex vivo of host-alloreactive T cells. When administered as a single, adjunctive infusion after T-cell-depleted haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo HSCT), ATIR101 may reduce serious complications resulting from delayed immune reconstitution such as infections and relapse. In a Phase II study, patients with hematologic malignancies who received ATIR101 had an overall survival (OS) of 61% and no Grade III/IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at 1 year post HSCT (Roy DC et al. ASH 2016). Similarly, an OS rate of 55% was reported in a second Phase II study (Olavarria E et al. EHA 2018). We report multivariable and subgroup analyses of a pooled dataset from these two Phase II studies of ATIR101, compared with a dataset of control patients meeting similar inclusion/exclusion criteria who underwent T-cell-depleted haplo HSCT without ATIR101, to assess the impact of potential prognostic factors on survival outcomes. Methods After showing comparability allowing the pooling of data, 1-year outcomes from two Phase II studies (CR-AIR-007, NCT01794299; CR-AIR-008, NCT02500550; data cut-off June 1, 2018) including 32 adult patients who received ATIR101 (2.0 × 106 cells/kg) were compared with a historic control of 35 patients treated with a T-cell-depleted haplo HSCT without ATIR101 in centers participating in ATIR101 trials (CR-AIR-006, NCT02188290). Patients with a hematologic malignancy (acute myeloid leukemia [AML], acute lymphoblastic leukemia [ALL], or myelodysplastic syndromes [MDS]) underwent myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning with or without total body irradiation (TBI) followed by a CD34+-selected stem cell graft from a haploidentical family donor. ATIR101, prepared from the same donor, was given approximately 28 days post HSCT to patients in the ATIR101 group without prophylactic immunosuppression post HSCT. Post hoc multivariable Cox regressions for non-relapse mortality (NRM) and OS were performed on the pooled ATIR101 and control datasets adjusting for treatment, diagnosis, conditioning regimen, remission status, European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation risk score, and total number of viable CD34+ (× 106 cells/kg) given to patients. Variables recognized as clinically important were forced into the model regardless of whether they were statistically significant. Results Overall, patient characteristics at baseline were balanced across groups (ATIR101 vs historic control): median age at HSCT (range) was 43 years (31-51) vs 43 years (28-54); patients had AML (66% vs 71%), ALL (28% vs 11%), or MDS (6% vs 17%); patients underwent myeloablative conditioning (100% vs 94%) with TBI (47% vs 66%) and were in complete remission (100% vs 83%) prior to transplantation. The incidence of Grade III/IV acute GVHD was similar in the ATIR101 and control groups (6%); however, only patients in the control group experienced severe chronic GVHD (2/35). Compared with the control group, the ATIR101 group showed a lower cumulative incidence of NRM (28% vs 66%; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.31; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.15-0.67; p=0.002) and a higher OS rate (63% vs 20%; HR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.17-0.69; p=0.002). Adjusting for potential prognostic factors, the benefit of ATIR101 was confirmed in a multivariable analysis for both NRM (HR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.09-0.78; p=0.016) and OS (HR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.11-0.70; p=0.006; Table). The addition of ATIR101 treatment following T-cell-depleted haplo HSCT improved survival outcomes compared with T-cell-depleted haplo HSCT alone, irrespective of patient baseline characteristics, as shown in the subgroup analyses (Figure). Conclusions A single infusion of ATIR101 after a T-cell-depleted haplo HSCT in patients with hematologic malignancies appears to improve survival outcomes compared with a T-cell-depleted haplo HSCT alone. After adjusting for potential prognostic risk factors, the multivariable analysis appears to support the clinical benefit of ATIR101 on NRM and OS at 1 year post HSCT. A large, global, randomized Phase 3 study is currently enrolling to further examine the efficacy and safety of T-cell-depleted haplo HSCT + ATIR101 compared with T-cell-replete haplo HSCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (HATCY; NCT02999854). Disclosures Roy: Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont: Patents & Royalties: Author on patent; University of Montreal: Patents & Royalties: Author on patent; Kiadis Pharma: Other: Travel support. Walker:Kiadis Pharma: Other: Grant funding via institution (as a principal investigator). Maertens:Astellas Pharma: Other: Personal fees and non-financial support; Cidara: Other: Personal fees and non-financial support; F2G: Other: Personal fees and non-financial support; Gilead Sciences: Other: Grants, personal fees and non-financial support; Merck: Other: Personal fees and non-financial support; Pfizer: Other: Grant and personal fees; Amplyx: Other: Personal fees and non-financial support. Olavarria:Kiadis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria. Selleslag:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celyad: Other: Clinical trial research (no honoraria recieved). Wagner:Pfizer: Other: Advisory board; Novartis: Other: Advisory board; MEDAC: Other: Travel support; MSD: Other: Advisory board. Bönig:Kiadis Pharma: Other: Contract manufacturing of ATIR101; Celgene, Novartis, Sandoz Hexal: Consultancy; Sandoz Hexal, Uniqure: Research Funding; Miletenyi: Speakers Bureau. Bos:Celgene: Research Funding; Kiadis Pharma: Other: Shareholder (of Cytosen, acquired by Kiadis). Mielke:ISCT: Other: Travel support; Jazz Pharma: Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Speakers Bureau; DGHO: Other: Travel support.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicCAR-T cell therapy research→French-language works237,207→