MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Air Health Trend Indicator: Association between Short-Term Exposure to Ground Ozone and Circulatory Hospitalizations in Canada for 17 Years, 1996-2012

2018· article· en· W2991272451 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsTrent UniversityHealth Canada
FundersHealth CanadaClean Air Regulatory AgendaEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
KeywordsMedicinePopulationDemographyPublic healthEnvironmental healthEpidemiologyGround Level OzoneAir pollutionInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The Air Health Trend Indicator is part of the Canadian Environmental Sustainability Indicators program in Canada. It is designed to estimate public health risk related to short-term exposure to air pollution and to detect trends in the annual national health risks.Design: Daily ozone, hospitalization (three circulatory diseases) and weather data for 24 urban cities (about 54% of Canadians) over a period of 17 years (1996-2012) were used. Through a Bayesian hierarchical model an estimator using 7-year blocks was employed to find trends in annual national associations by season, lag of effect, sex and two age groups (≤65 vs >65).Results: The Canadian population is growing and aging but getting healthier as hospitalization rates have declined from 10% to 8%. Females were hospitalized more than males (57% vs 43%) and circulatory hospitalization was about 16% of all causes. This study examined three circulatory causes: Ischaemic heart disease (IHD, ICD_I20-I25, 40% of cases), other heart disease (OHD, ICD_I30-I52, 31%) and cerebrovascular disease (CEV, ICD_I60-I69, 14%). For warm season the baseline national risk per 10 ppb of 1-day lagged ozone was 0.4% (-0.3%~1.1%) for IHD, 0.7% (0.05%~1.3%) for OHD, and 0.2% (-0.8%~1.2%) for CEV. While an age effect was identified, more difference was detected by sex, with males more vulnerable to ozone for CEV and OHD. While IHD showed decreasing trends for recent years (2009 onwards) regardless age and sex, CEV did slightly increasing trends overall. In contrast, CEV did mixed trends by sex, with an increasing trend for males only.Discussions: The sex-specific differences in circulatory hospitalization risk need further investigations. The study findings could reduce knowledge gap by identifying sub-populations susceptible to ozone by season, age, sex and trend. The temporal trends in ozone’s impact on circulatory hospitalization could help develop air pollution regulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.630
Threshold uncertainty score0.709

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it