MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2991285502 · doi:10.1109/tpel.2019.2956353

Efficient Permanent Magnet Temperature Modeling and Estimation for Dual Three-Phase PMSM Considering Inverter Nonlinearity

2019· article· en· W2991285502 on OpenAlexaff
Guodong Feng, Chunyan Lai, Wenlong Li, Ze Li, Narayan C. Kar

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WindsorConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInverterControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemMagnetTorqueComputer scienceDirect torque controlDual (grammatical number)EngineeringPhysicsVoltageInduction motorElectrical engineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate temperature information is crucial to dual three-phase permanent magnet synchronous machine (DT-PMSM) drives. Therefore, this article proposes two efficient models for permanent magnet temperature estimation of DT-PMSMs. The proposed models are derived through current injection in the reference frame that does not contribute to torque production. Through current injection, the proposed models can fully explore the two sets of machine equations to cancel winding resistance and machine inductances. To improve the estimation performance, inverter nonlinearity is compensated in the first model and cancelled in the second model. In comparison to existing methods, the proposed approach is computationally efficient and robust to parameter variation, magnetic saturation, and inverter nonlinearity. Moreover, the current injection will not affect the machine torque production and control performance. The proposed estimation approach is evaluated on a laboratory DT-PMSM under various operating conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power ElectronicsSame topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207