MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2991296450 · doi:10.1289/isee.2013.o-3-16-01

Land-Use Regression Models for Metals Associated with Airborne Particulate Matter in Calgary, Alberta

2013· article· en· W2991296450 on OpenAlex
Markey Johnson, Jue Yi Zhang, Liu Sun, Olesya Elikan, Stefania Bertazzon

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticulatesEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental chemistryMercury (programming language)Aerodynamic diameterArsenicPollutantAir pollutionEnvironmental engineeringAtmospheric sciencesChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Fine airborne particulate matter has been associated with cardiovascular and respiratory morbidity and mortality, and there is evidence that metals may contribute to these adverse health effects. We developed seasonal land-use regression (LUR) models to characterize the spatial distribution of PM-associated metals in Calgary, Alberta. Previous studies have successfully modeled PM and gaseous pollutants; however, to our knowledge this is the first study to develop LUR models for metals. Methods: Particulate matter with <1.0 µm in aerodynamic diameter (PM1.0) was measured at 25 sites during 2-week periods in August 2010 and January 2011. PM1.0 filters were analyzed using inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Industrial sources were obtained through the National Pollutant Release Inventory and verified using Google Maps. Traffic and zoning data were obtained from the City of Calgary. Predictor variables were generated using ArcMap-10.1. LUR models for arsenic, chromium, copper, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, vanadium, and zinc were developed using SAS-EG-4.2. Results: Preliminary summer models explained 60-90% of the variability in arsenic, chromium, copper, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, vanadium, and zinc, while winter models explained 40-80% of the variability in metals concentrations. Industrial sources and industrial land-use zoning were the strongest predictors (p<0.05). However, traffic was not a major predictor for most metals. These findings contrast with LUR models for PM and gaseous pollutants in which traffic variables were highly influential. There was an average improvement of 5-10% in model efficacy when wind speed and direction were included. Conclusions: These results suggest that airborne metals vary spatially with the distribution of local industrial sources and that LUR modeling can be used to predict local metals concentrations. Future analyses will include LUR modeling of the remaining PM-components.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.619
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it