MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

La subordinación ideológica del saber médico andino en la salud intercultural chilena

2019· article· es· W2991302944 on OpenAlex
Carlos Daniel Piñones Rivera, Nanette Paz Liberona Concha, Barbara Montecino Quenaya

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePolis (Santiago) · 2019
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Education, Indigenous Social Dynamics
Canadian institutionsApache (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Existen pocos estudios que aborden los procesos ideológicos presentes en las relaciones interculturales propiciadas por las iniciativas de Salud Pueblos Indígenas en Chile. Nuestro objetivo es mostrar cómo los elementos ideológicos del Saber Biomédico contribuyen a la subordinación del Saber Andino al interior de dichos programas. Para esto, expondremos material etnográfico producido entre 2011 y 2012 en la comunidad de Camiña, Tarapacá. Posicionados desde la Antropología Médica Crítica, analizamos la ideología biomédica sobre el Saber Andino, así como las propuestas para la interculturalidad que surgen desde el personal biomédico. Concluimos reflexionando cómo la negación del carácter ideológico de la racionalidad biomédica, refuerza la subordinación del Saber Andino, produciendo un efecto opuesto al mentado en la política pública.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.399
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it