MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2991309845 · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.450

Determinants of Pro-Environmental Activity-Travel Behavior Using GPS-Based Application and SEM Approach

2019· article· en· W2991309845 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Computer Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Transport and Accessibility
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean CommissionAcadia University
KeywordsGlobal Positioning SystemTravel behaviorComputer scienceTheory of planned behaviorStructural equation modelingIntervention (counseling)Travel timeSimulationTransport engineeringControl (management)Artificial intelligencePsychologyMachine learningTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Technological advancement in automobile and infrastructure sector encourages more and longer distance travel and the way people travel to perform their daily tasks creates environmental problems. Activity-travel behavior of individual have a significant potential to be influenced to reduce environmental issues, however, the underlying factors need to be investigated. This paper investigates pro-environmental activity-travel behavior using recorded GPS-based travel-activity diaries and individual personal traits using online questionnaire and estimating a structure equation model borrowed from theory of planned behavior. The results of the study verified that individual mobility decisions were highly influenced by the attitude one has about specific travel behavior. The results are helpful in devising effective behavioral intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.116
Threshold uncertainty score0.342

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it