MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Urban Greenness Extracted from Pedestrian Video and Its Relationship with Surrounding Air Temperatures

2018· article· en· W2991321299 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Heat Island Mitigation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Centre for Disease Control
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPixelStandard deviationOvercastEnvironmental scienceRangingPython (programming language)PopulationRemote sensingGeographyStatisticsCartographyPhysical geographyMeteorologyMathematicsComputer scienceSky

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Urban greenness has been associated with a wide range of health benefits, partially attributable to local cooling and visually-stimulated stress reduction. Several approaches have been used to assess greenness exposure at individual and population scales, but there is discrepancy between methods. Image processing of pedestrian video data, collected as part of a study on microscale urban air temperature, provide a novel source of street-level information on vegetation.Methods: Python was used to extract green, yellow, and shaded pixels from ~10 million frames of video footage collected during 40 sampling runs of 20 urban routes measuring 8-10 km. Resulting greenness values (combined total of green, yellow, and shaded pixels as a percentage of all pixels) were compared with concurrent air temperatures using correlations, time series plots, and maps. Shaded pixels were included because vegetation can generate large shaded areas on hot summer days.Results: The mean air temperature measured across the 40 runs ranged from 19.8 to 31.9 °C, with standard deviations ranging from 0.26 to 1.21 °C. In comparison, the mean greenness ranged from 52% to 65%, with standard deviations ranging from 6% to 13%. Correlations ranged from -0.61 to 0.34 and were in the expected direction for 31 of 40 runs, with plots and maps showing clear inverse relationships in many cases. Flat and weakly positive relationships occurred when background temperatures were low, conditions were overcast, or routes were closer to large waterways.Conclusions: Secondary data are limited for such evaluations, but with further refinement, our methods could provide unprecedented spatial and temporal resolution for greenness exposure assessment in individual-level studies. They could also be used to evaluate and compare models used to assess exposure at the population scale as long as the video footage is temporally matched with other methods, such as satellite overpasses or Google Street View imaging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.749

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it