Experimental Investigation of Nozzle Orientation Effects on Mixing Characteristics of Elliptic Triple Free Jets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract An experimental investigation of nozzle orientation effects on turbulent characteristics of elliptic triple free jets was carried out for three nozzle configurations. The first configuration had all three nozzles oriented along the minor plane (3_Minor), the next had two nozzles oriented along the minor plane and one along the major plane (2_Minor_1_Major) and the last configuration had one nozzle oriented along the minor plane and two along the major plane (1_Minor_2_Major). The experiments were conducted using modified contoured nozzles with a sharp linear contraction for a nozzle-to-nozzle distance of 4.1, a nozzle equivalent diameter of 9 mm and a Reynolds number of 10,000. The effects of nozzle orientation on the mean velocity, turbulence intensity and Reynolds shear stress were discussed. The velocity decay, jet spread, merging point, combined point and potential core length were used to characterize the effects of nozzle orientation on the mixing performance. The results show that the 3_Minor configuration had shorter potential core length and closer merging point location which are indicative of a faster mixing in the converging region. Two-point correlation, skewness and flatness factors were used to provide insight into the effects of nozzle orientation on turbulence structure and higher order turbulence statistics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".