MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A novel self-expanding primarily bioabsorbable braided flow-diverting stent for aneurysms: initial safety results

2019· article· en· W2991419531 on OpenAlexafffund
M Jamshidi, Mahmoud Rajabian, Michael B. Avery, Uttandaraman Sundararaj, Janet L. Ronsky, Brooke L. Belanger, John H. Wong, Alim P. Mitha

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of NeuroInterventional Surgery · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAortic aneurysm repair treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMedicineStentFlow (mathematics)AneurysmSlow FlowSurgeryInternal medicineMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: The advent of metal flow-diverting stents has provided neurointerventionalists with an option for treating aneurysms without requiring manipulations within the aneurysm sac. The large amount of metal in these stents, however, can lead to early and late thrombotic complications, and thus requires long-term antiplatelet agents. Bioabsorbable stents have been postulated to mitigate the risk of these complications. Here we present early data on the first self-expandable primarily bioabsorbable stent for aneurysms. METHODS: Braided stents were developed using poly-L-lactic acid fibers with material surface area similar to metal flow diverters. Crush resistance force, hemolysis, and thrombogenicity were determined and compared with existing commercial devices. Stents were deployed in infra-renal rabbit aortas to determine angiographic side branch patency and to study neointima formation for a 1-month follow-up period. RESULTS: Crush resistance force was determined to be on the order of existing commercial devices. Hemolytic behavior was similar to existing metal devices, and thrombogenicity was lower than metal flow-diverting stents. A smooth neointimal layer was found over the absorbable stent surface and all covered side branches were patent at follow-up. CONCLUSION: The design of self-expanding primarily bioabsorbable flow-diverting stents is possible, and preliminary safety data is consistent with a favorable profile in terms of mechanical behavior, hemocompatibility, side branch patency, and histological effects. Additional in vitro and long-term in vivo studies are in progress and will help determine aneurysm occlusion rates and absorption characteristics of the stent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.237
Threshold uncertainty score0.915

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeuroInterventional SurgerySame topicAortic aneurysm repair treatmentsFrench-language works237,207