Performance of Multi-Cell Massive MIMO Systems With Interference Decoding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider a multi-cell massive MIMO system where a time-division duplex protocol is used to estimate the channel state information via uplink pilots. When maximum ratio combining (MRC) is used at the BSs, the re-use of pilots across cells causes the pilot contamination effect which yields interference components that do not vanish as the number of base-station (BS) antennas M → ∞. When treating interference as noise (TIN), this phenomenon limits the performance of multicell massive MIMO systems. In this paper, we analyze more advanced schemes based on simultaneous unique decoding (SD) as well as simultaneous non-unique decoding (SND) of the interference that can provide unbounded rate as M → ∞. We also establish a worst-case uncorrelated noise technique for multiple-access channels to derive achievable rate expressions for finite M. Furthermore, we study a much simpler subset of SND (called S-SND) which provides a lower bound to SND and achieves unbounded rate as M → ∞, and also outperforms SD for finite M. For the special cases of two-cell and threecell systems, using a maximum symmetric rate allocation policy we compare the performance of different interference decoding schemes with that of TIN. Finally, we numerically illustrate the improved performance of the proposed schemes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".