Un análisis de contenido de libros de texto para la alfabetización emancipadora de adultos en el contexto educativo poscolonial. El caso de la Amazonia brasileña en los años 1980
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Esta investigación se centra en el estudio de la noción de emancipación en libros didácticos de inspiración freireana que sirvieron a la alfabetización de adultos en el contexto de la educación postcolonial en el norte de Brasil, entre los años 1960 y 1980. Este estudio se apoya en la metodología del análisis de contenido de libros de texto y en la literatura sobre la Educación a la Ciudadanía, pues el objetivo central fue construir y evaluar la solidez de un modelo conceptual de alfabetización emancipadora a través de tres pasos metodológicos para analizar los contenidos en libros de texto que son favorables para el desarrollo de dicho tipo de alfabetización. Se constató que en la muestra estudiada los tipos del ciudadano orientado a la justicia o de ciudadano participativo forman parte de los criterios primordiales que ayudan a definir los contenidos de libros de texto favorables a una alfabetización emancipadora.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.035 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".