MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2991513358 · doi:10.1115/omae2019-95163

Plug and Abandonment Environment in British Columbia

2019· article· en· W2991513358 on OpenAlexaffabout
Majid Bizhani, E. Trudel, I.A. Frigaard

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbandonment (legal)Hydraulic fracturingPetroleum engineeringGeologyPetroleum industryDrillingFossil fuelOil productionWell drillingStock (firearms)Oil wellProduction (economics)Directional drillingEngineeringArchaeologyGeographyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract British Columbia (BC) has a significant oil & gas industry, with approximately 25,000 wells drilled in the province since the early 1900s. In the past few decades, the industry has changed from a balanced oil & gas production to activities dominated by unconventional gas production which is recovered by hydraulic fracturing. Concurrently, since 2000 there has been a shift from isolated vertical wells to pad-drilled horizontal wells. The older well stock at end-of-life combines with horizontal production wells and fractured reservoirs, the consequence of which is a growing wave of abandonment in BC, building over the next decade. This paper reviews the existing data on BC wells, as it is relevant to well abandonment operations. This includes the well architectures, trajectories, depths, testing procedures, etc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.226

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.146
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis→French-language works237,207→