MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pollen Counts in Four Canadian Cities: Geographical Variation between 2008 and 2012

2018· article· en· W2991532436 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAllergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of British Columbia HospitalPublic Health OntarioBC Centre for Disease ControlNovartis (Canada)Environment and Climate Change CanadaMcMaster UniversityUniversity of ManitobaSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPollenGeographyAeroallergenDemographyEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pollen grains from anemophilous plants represent an important class of aeroallergens in ambient air. High concentrations of aeroallergens, including tree and grass pollen are associated with increased asthma-related emergency department visits and hospitalizations across Canada.The geographical distribution of species of plants is dependent on multiple factors, including precipitation, soil composition and moisture and average high and low temperatures. Five “floristic zones” that support the growth of different aeroallergen-producing plants have been defined across Canada. Here we examine the differences among four Canadian cities (Vancouver, Edmonton, Winnipeg and Toronto) situated in four of the Canadian floristic zones. We describe pollen counts with respect to: start and end dates of the pollen seasons; season length; and annual pollen counts between 2008 and 2012. These cities and years were chosen to cover the antenatal and perinatal windows of sensitization for the participants in the Canadian Healthy Infant Longitudinal Development (CHILD) birth cohort. Pollen season was defined considering the dates when the 5% and 95% of the annual total was recorded for each pollen.The following table presents the 5-year average for pollen count and season duration for trees and grasses. With these data and estimates of traffic-related-air-pollution exposure we will present the combined effects in the development of early-life asthma.Trees GrassesCity Average pollen (grains/m3) Average season duration (days) Average pollen Average season duration ParticipantsVancouver/42926.2/92.6/1497.8/74.6/992Edmonton/7368.4/71.2/1522.3/54.4/774Winnipeg/16904.1/50.8/1564.3/70.6/738Toronto/16915.5/71.2/991.8/107/770The geographical differences may suggest the particular needs of atopy prone and sensitized individuals in each city, and the potential need to account for local contexts when designing public health initiatives related to aeroallergen information and to green space.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.216
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it