MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2991538963 · doi:10.4000/nrt.6433

Pascal Ughetto, Organiser l’autonomie au travail, Limoges, FYP Éditions, 2018, 160 p.

2019· article· fr· W2991538963 on OpenAlexaff
Olivier Cléach

Bibliographic record

VenueLa Nouvelle revue du travail · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsSNC-Lavalin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPascal (unit)Political scienceArtComputer scienceProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depuis qu’on a divisé et organisé le travail pour plus d’efficacité, les modèles, les dispositifs, les procédés se sont succédé… Dans cet ouvrage, Pascal Ughetto, enseignant-chercheur en sociologie, se propose de revenir sur les plus récents, de faire le bilan des formes actuelles de mises au travail facilitées et influencées par la digitalisation. La réflexivité sur ces pratiques managériales semble d’ailleurs à la mode : citons, par exemple, les ouvrages de F. Laloux (Reinventing Organizati...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.255
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLa Nouvelle revue du travailSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207