MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2991551685 · doi:10.29122/jai.v10i1.3751

POTENSI SITU JABODETABEK SEBAGAI WADUK RESAPAN

2019· article· id· W2991551685 on OpenAlex
Teddy W Sudinda

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Air Indonesia · 2019
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunity-based Tourism Development and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Keberadaan situ-situ di wilayah Jabodetabek sampai saat ini dapat dikatakan terlantar dalam penanganannya sehingga telah terjadi perubahan fungsi. Dengan semakin besarnya konsentrasi penduduk di wilayah Jabotabek maka beban terhadap sumberdaya air di wilayah tersebut semakin besar. Keadaan di atas merupakan ancaman bagi konservasi sumber daya air. Upaya pelestarian situ dalam rangka perlindungan dan konservasi sumberdaya alam, khususnya sumberdaya air, dan ekosistem secara keseluruhan perlu dilakukan secara terpadu oleh semua pihak yang terkait dan berkepentingan dan melibatkan berbagai disiplin ilmu. Untuk mengetahui potensi situ yang memungkinkan fungsinya sebagai waduk resapan perlu didahului dengan inventarisasi mencakup aspek teknis dan IPTEK.Kata kunci: waduk resapan (WR), konservasi, aquifer

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.280
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it