MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2991564677 · doi:10.1109/ecce.2019.8912250

Hybrid Model Predictive Control of Active-Neutral-Point-Clamped Multilevel Converters

2019· article· en· W2991564677 on OpenAlexaff
Dehong Zhou, Zhongyi Quan, Yunwei Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModel predictive controlConvertersControl theory (sociology)Duty cycleCapacitorVoltageTransient (computer programming)Computer scienceTotal harmonic distortionHarmonicEngineeringElectronic engineeringControl (management)Electrical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To reduce the power losses, the high-voltage switches in active-neutral-point-clamped (ANPC) multilevel converters always operates at the fundamental frequency. Moreover, DC-link capacitor and flying capacitor voltage balance control is mandatory in addition to output current control in the ANPC converters. Model predictive control (MPC) can provide this flexibility and feature high dynamics for transient operations. However, conventional MPC experiences variable switching frequency, high total harmonic distortion. Moreover, as there is no modulator in the conventional MPC, it is very hard to guarantee the fundamental-frequency operation of the high-voltage switches. Given the issues above, a hybrid MPC is proposed to control the ANPC converter in this paper, where finite-control-set MPC is utilized for high-voltage switch control, and duty-cycle-optimized MPC is utilized for the low-voltage switch control. The proposed MPC features a fixed switching frequency and improves the steady-state performance with simplified implementation. The validation of the proposed hybrid MPC strategy is conducted on a five-level ANPC converter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207