MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2991569184 · doi:10.3390/math7121143

Variational Bayesian Iterative Estimation Algorithm for Linear Difference Equation Systems

2019· article· en· W2991569184 on OpenAlexaff
Junxia Ma, Qiuling Fei, Fan Guo, Weili Xiong

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDiscretizationMathematicsApplied mathematicsKalman filterDifferential equationPartial differential equationBasis (linear algebra)Iterative methodAlgorithmMathematical optimizationComputer scienceMathematical analysisStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many basic laws of physics or chemistry can be written in the form of differential equations. With the development of digital signals and computer technology, the research on discrete models has received more and more attention. The estimates of the unknown coefficients in the discretized difference equation can be obtained by optimizing certain criterion functions. In modern control theory, the state-space model transforms high-order differential equations into first-order differential equations by introducing intermediate state variables. In this paper, the parameter estimation problem for linear difference equation systems with uncertain noise is developed. By transforming system equations into state-space models and on the basis of the considered priors of the noise and parameters, a variational Bayesian iterative estimation algorithm is derived from the observation data to obtain the parameter estimates. The unknown states involved in the variational Bayesian algorithm are updated by the Kalman filter. A numerical simulation example is given to validate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematicsSame topicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207