MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2991571527

Prescription exercise at Queen's: A prospective program evaluation of physical activity effects among university students with depression and anxiety

2019· article· en· W2991571527 on OpenAlexaffabout
Stephanie M. Flood, Priscilla P Leung, Freeman Woolnough, Beth Blackett, Tiffany Bambrick, Jennifer R. Tomasone

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Exercise, Movement, and Sport (SCAPPS refereed abstracts repository) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhysical Activity and Health
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnxietyMental healthDepression (economics)PsychologyClinical psychologyRepeated measures designMedicinePsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Participation in physical activity (PA) may lead to positive improvements in mental health status. Prescription Exercise at Queen's (PE-Q) is an eight-week PA program that offers students with mild to moderate depression and/or anxiety with the option to supplement their treatment with exercise. The program includes personal training sessions, self-selected PA, and a peer-delivered 'Brief Action Planning' self-management component. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of the PE-Q program on participants' mental health symptoms and PA behaviour and social cognitions (based on the Health Action Process Approach). Twenty-one participants completed pre-, mid- and post-program online questionnaires. Separate repeated measures ANOVAs and post-hoc t-tests evaluated changes in participants' mental health symptoms, PA behaviour and social cognitions. Significant decreases in participants' depression symptoms and anxiety symptoms were reported from pre- to mid-program (ds ? 0.98; ps < 0.05), which were maintained from mid- to post-program. Significant increases in participants' PA planning and action control were reported from pre-to mid-program (ds ? 1.04; ps < 0.05), which were also maintained from mid- to post-program. In general, students provided high ratings for program instructiveness, usefulness, credibility, and personal importance (all Ms ? 5.57 out of 7). While these findings contribute to existing literature on holistic treatment programs for students with mental illnesses, further testing with a control group and an adequately-powered sample is warranted.Acknowledgments: Funding for the PE-Q program 2017-2018 was provided by a Special Projects Grant from Michael Condra in the Department of Psychology at Queen's University. Initial startup funding for the PE-Q program was provided by the First Year Experience Fund (Queen's University) and jack.org. Ms. Flood is supported by a SSHRC Canadian Graduate Scholarship - Master's.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Exercise, Movement, and Sport (SCAPPS refereed abstracts repository)Same topicPhysical Activity and HealthFrench-language works237,207