Energy Efficient Collaborative Beamforming for Reducing Sidelobe in Wireless Sensor Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Collaborative beamforming (CB) in wireless sensor networks (WSNs) based on a virtual node antenna array (VNAA) can increase the transmission distance and enhance the energy efficiency of sensor nodes. However, a VNAA cannot be pre-designed like the conventional antenna arrays due to the randomly deployed sensor nodes, thereby causing a high sidelobe level (SLL) which increases the interferences. In this article, we formulate a hybrid discrete and continuous optimization problem (HDCOP) for reducing the maximum SLL. HDCOP requires to solve both the discrete and the continuous problems simultaneously, and we propose both centralized and consensus-based distributed CB strategies for solving HDCOP. For the centralized strategy, we convert HDCOP into two sub-optimization problems, and propose a discrete cuckoo search (CS) algorithm for the node location selection optimization and a continuous CS algorithm to optimize the excitation current weights of the selected nodes. For the distributed strategy, we propose a parallel distributed CS algorithm to solve the discrete and continuous parts of HDCOP simultaneously. Moreover, we propose two operating mechanisms based on these two algorithms. Simulation results verify the effectiveness of the proposed strategies for reducing the maximum SLL of CB in WSNs. Moreover, the proposed CB strategies have better performance in terms of the energy efficiency compared with other approaches such as the cross-entropy optimization-based method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".