MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Michigan-West Africa Geohealth Hub: Environmental Exposures Due to Informal E-Waste Recycling Activities and the Health of Workers

2018· article· en· W2991654446 on OpenAlex
Julius N. Fobil, Niladri Basu, Stuart Batterman, Thomas Robins

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare and Environmental Waste Management
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental healthMedicineEnvironmental scienceToxicologyBusinessBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Overview: The West Africa-Michigan CHARTER II GEOHealth Hub, jointly funded by the US NIH/FIC and Canada’s IDRC, integrates research and research training activities of West African Anglophone and Francophone institutions, with support from the University of Michigan and McGill University. Research Goal: To increase multi-disciplinary understanding of the risks associated with waste recycling, and to use study findings to inform evidence-based implementation activities and policy options at multi-levels. Specific Objectives: Include: 1) characterize work-related, time-varying, job-specific exposures of electronic waste recycling workers at the Agbogbloshie site, and assess biological markers of dose, to metals, organic compounds, and markers of combustion products; 2) provide estimates of potentially increased lifetime, work-exposure-associated cancer risks; and, 3) evaluate associations of exposures with measures of acute and chronic respiratory morbidity in workers. Methodology: A longitudinal design in which we enrolled a combined total of 151 study participants over a 3-week period. We collected and are analyzing, repeated measures across seasons for each participant: 1) biological samples for a) metals, b) organic compounds including flame retardants, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, dioxin-related compounds, and 2) personal air monitoring, through a combination of real-time measurements and analysis of size-specific samples collected on filters, including markers of combustion products. Results: Preliminary filter-based data show that e-waste workers have breathing zone PM2.5 concentrations of 135 ± 188 µg m-3 (mean ± st. dev., n = 89) compared to 45 ± 18 µg m-3 (n = 43) of controls; these worker exposures are considerably higher than levels obtained using area monitoring at the waste site, e.g., 84 ± 24 µg m-3 (n = 9). Based on real-time measurements, burning tasks resulted in exceptionally high PM2.5 exposures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.858
Threshold uncertainty score0.470

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it