La certification ISO 14 001 : une perspective néo-institutionnelle
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this article is to analyze, through the case study of the implementation of ISO 14001 standards in Canadian plant installations, the way in which organizations integrate the formal structures that result from institutional pressures. In particular, the study examines the ritual and ceremonial aspects of conformity to these structures. The study shows that the adoption of ISO 14001 corresponds to a coercive isomorphism that, in-house, leads to the adoption of a system serving to bring greater rationality and tighter control to environmental management practices. However, the procedural rationality of the standards leads to perverse outcomes, the intensity of which varies depending on the case studied: the lack of employee involvement, the bureaucratic red tape of the system, and the ritual nature of certain practices especially during audits. The study's findings contribute to illustrating the symbolic and managerial aspects of institutional phenomena by showing the contradictions and the difficulties they create for the management of organizations. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it