Bibliographic record
Abstract
“Cul-de-sac” is in common a residential dead-end street. However, it is an important urban element used for articulating vernacular housing in the Arab cities to form a wide range of cluster. It has also a main role of providing a safe and healthy environment for residents, which is suitable for social domestic activities. This paper aims to highlight a potential idea to recover the concept of vernacular Cul-de-sac but in a contemporary way. Thus, we will try to shade light on a modern type of residential streets, which is the upper street that functions as a main stem for articulating houses around it. This type of streets was named in the modern movement as a “Street in the sky”. Thus the paper investigates the connection between streets in the sky and the vernacular Cul-de-sac, by discussing a famous case of the modern housing: Habitat 67, which is cluster housing around layers of streets in the city of Montreal. The paper concludes that, the upper streets of cluster housing are an adequate approach for recovering the vernacular Cul-de-sac in terms of social and visual aspects, since it could combine characteristics of both vernacular Cul-de-sac and the street in the sky.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".