Les effets de deux programmes d’entrainement sur le développement d’habiletés de compréhension, de déchiffrement et de fluidité en lecture d’élèves francophones de deuxième année du primaire du Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le but de la presente etude etait d’evaluer les effets de deux programmes d’entrainement (lecture seulement et lecture-musique) sur l’apprentissage de la lecture d’eleves de 2e annee. Un design quasi experimental avec pretest et posttest a ete employe. Les participants (n=94) ont ete divises en trois groupes : lecture seulement (LS) (n=44), lecture-musique (LM) (n=34) et controle (n=16). Les programmes experimentaux ont pris place pendant quatre mois a raison de trois periodes par cycle de dix jours. Il semblerait que les programmes LS et LM ont eu un effet favorable sur la precision en lecture, alors que tous les groupes se sont significativement ameliores en comprehension, en dechiffrement et en vitesse de lecture. Des pistes d’explication sont fournies dans la discussion. Mots-cles : Apprentissage de la lecture; apprentissage de la musique; debut du primaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".